[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Recieve site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 3, Issue 7 (5-2019) ::
2019, 3(7): 0-0 Back to browse issues page
Reviewing the position and relevance of votes from the Supreme Audit Court's judiciary with the votes of the judicial authorities
Abstract:   (3086 Views)
Fighting corruption and reducing its context requires proper confrontation with crimes and financial misconduct within the state apparatus, and today it is important to address the legal aspects of the crimes and financial misconduct of government employees both in terms of content and form.
Offenses and offenses of state employees may be merely a mere offense or may have both criminal and offensive aspects. In accordance with Article 159 of the Constitution and the Code of Criminal Procedure, the General Prosecutor General, the judicial authorities and, in particular, the Public Prosecutor and the Revolutionary Court. On the other hand, one of the agencies dealing with violations in the financial affairs of government employees is the Board of the Supreme Audit Institution. In this article, in a descriptive-analytical manner, while examining the legal basis for the simultaneous entry of the constituent panels of the Court of Audit and Judicial Courts into certain crimes of state employees, how the two references interact and the challenges facing them in the light of the validity of the principle and the principle of the prohibition of double punishment Analysis will be analyzed.
Keywords: Committees, Double Penalties, Credits, Offenses, Offenses
Full-Text [PDF 148 kb]   (3232 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Applicable | Subject: General
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Reviewing the position and relevance of votes from the Supreme Audit Court's judiciary with the votes of the judicial authorities. Journal title 2019; 3 (7)
URL: http://malieh.dmk.ir/article-1-85-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 3, Issue 7 (5-2019) Back to browse issues page
دانش حقوق و مالیه Knowledge of Law and Finance
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.08 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4657