[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Recieve site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 7, Issue 23 (5-2023) ::
2023, 7(23): 34-50 Back to browse issues page
Governments Unilateral withdrawal from international obligations and it’s legal consequences with emphasis on JCPOA
Maryam Hendi * , Mohsen Taheri
Islamic Azad, Semnan,lran
Abstract:   (420 Views)
Many actions and decisions of governments in the international arena are unilaterally implemented and adopted. Perhaps this is a natural feature of today's world. Governments commit themselves to unilateral actions and consider themselves entitled to unilateral actions by other states. For this reason, "unilateralism" has been described as a "highly significant" feature in international relations. Islamic Republic of Iran is considered as a security threat to the West, especially the United States. Thus, the West offered two general approaches to limiting Iran's nuclear capacity, one of which was a peaceful solution or punitive measures, and the other was a military confrontation. The West first accepted the first solution, which was also in line with the UN Charter, which emphasized on the multilateralism and the role of international organizations. Negotiations between Iran and the six world powers eventually led to the signing of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Under this agreement, Iran accepted broad restrictions on its nuclear program and in return lifted UN sanctions, as well as unilateral US and European sanctions. Because this agreement was related to international security, the same agreement was approved by the UN Security Council. Unfortunately, the Americans considered Burjam as an agreement that is against the national interest and withdrew it unilaterally. The United States has been the most serious and clear example of the Security Council's ineffectiveness in safeguarding an agreement on international peace and security.
Keywords: JCPOA, Iran Nuclear Program, US, UN Security Council
Full-Text [PDF 943 kb]   (61 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hendi M, Taheri M. Governments Unilateral withdrawal from international obligations and it’s legal consequences with emphasis on JCPOA. Journal title 2023; 7 (23) :34-50
URL: http://malieh.dmk.ir/article-1-289-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 7, Issue 23 (5-2023) Back to browse issues page
دانش حقوق و مالیه Knowledge of Law and Finance
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.08 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4657