|
Criticism on the Unanimity Resolution No. 2764 on the subject of reinstatement of retired veterans
|
Cyrus Khorrmi Refeni *   |
| Accounts Court of the country |
|
|
Abstract: (287 Views) |
The General Board of the Court of Administrative Justice in the unanimous ruling No. 2764 dated 09/26/1398 regarding the reinstatement of retired veterans with 30 years of work experience to complete 35 years of service, with a different conclusion from clauses "C" and "R" of Article (87) The Law of the Sixth Five-Year Development Plan puts the return to service of the veterans mentioned in paragraph "C" in the ranks of the veterans mentioned in paragraph "R" and considers the condition of return to service for these persons to have at least a bachelor's degree. Regardless of this vote's opposition to the principles of interpretation of the supporting laws, this vote is against Article (1) of the comprehensive law on providing services to veterans in the definition of the terms "sacrifice" and "veteran". The presented inference is due to the additional note of Article 103 of the Civil Service Management Law (Clause "R" of Article (87) of the Program Law), which has caused the filling of Clause "C" of this law regarding "veterans". In this article, while exploring the possible reasons for this inference of the court and rejecting the impressions made, the wisdom of the legislator's ruling and the conclusion will be discussed in this article. |
|
| Keywords: Court of Accounts, sacrifices, veterans, Court of Administrative Justice, reinstatement. |
|
|
Full-Text [PDF 925 kb]
(372 Downloads)
|
|
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Send email to the article author |
|
|
|
| Add your comments about this article |
|
|
|
