[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Recieve site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 9, Issue 33 (2025) ::
2025, 9(33): 81-99 Back to browse issues page
A Legal Analysis of the Impact of Continuous Supervision (Article 1 of the Supreme Audit Court Act) on the Financial Behavior of Executive Managers in Hamadan Province: Emphasizing the Boundary between Prudence and Omission of Duty
Ali Jamshidi Vashuri * , Amir Ali Bahrami
Abstract:   (39 Views)
Continuous financial supervision under Article 1 of the Supreme Audit Court of Iran Act is designed as a fundamental mechanism to safeguard the public treasury through ongoing control of financial operations, auditing of expenditures and revenues, and preparation of the budget discharge report. However, the expansion and intensification of such oversight may generate unintended dual effects on the financial behavior of executive managers. This study aims to provide a legal analysis of how the perception of continuous supervision influences conservative behavior and omission of duty among financial managers in Hamadan Province. Employing a descriptive-survey and correlational design, the research utilized a researcher-made 5-point Likert scale questionnaire whose content validity was confirmed by Supreme Audit Court experts and whose reliability was established through Cronbach's alpha coefficient (0.84), subsequently distributed among a purposive sample of 40 comptrollers and senior financial managers in the province. The central legal question was whether continuous supervision fosters constructive prudence through compliance with Article 23(b) or induces managerial inertia, defined as omission of duty stemming from fear of prosecution under Article 23(e). Findings revealed a statistically significant positive relationship between the perception of continuous supervision and managers' tendency to engage in omission of duty (P < 0.05). The study concludes that in order to genuinely safeguard the public treasury, the Supreme Audit Court must draw a clearer legal boundary between violation and legitimate managerial risk-taking while simultaneously strengthening ex-ante preventive supervision mechanisms, thereby recalibrating the behavioral impact of its oversight on public managers.

Keywords: Continuous Supervision, Supreme Audit Court of Iran, Financial Behavior of Managers, Omission of Duty, Hamadan Province.
Full-Text [PDF 628 kb]   (12 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Applicable | Subject: Special
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Jamshidi Vashuri A, Bahrami A A. A Legal Analysis of the Impact of Continuous Supervision (Article 1 of the Supreme Audit Court Act) on the Financial Behavior of Executive Managers in Hamadan Province: Emphasizing the Boundary between Prudence and Omission of Duty. Journal title 2025; 9 (33) :81-99
URL: http://malieh.dmk.ir/article-1-376-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 9, Issue 33 (2025) Back to browse issues page
دانش حقوق و مالیه Knowledge of Law and Finance
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.14 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4766