|
Comparative Comparison of the Appeal procedure from verdictby the supreme Audit court and the General Courts of Justice
|
Mehri Haghighi *   , Kheyrollah Parvin , Fathollah Rahimi |
|
|
|
Abstract: (2990 Views) |
Pursuant to Article 156 of the Constitution, the Office of the Jurisdiction is the restoration of public rights and the spread of justice and legitimate freedoms. The public courts, regardless of the nature of the proceedings or the nature, have the right to a fair hearing and the issuance of a judgment against a public prosecution, appear to be The court of the General Court of Justice, which holds private law, is considering the issues of Shiite jurisprudence and the fact that the growth of private law rights in Iran and the emergence of administrative law always adhere to the principles of the Shari'a judiciary, Self-government or government-owned, subject to doubt and doubt, including consideration of the Bam calculations Jeb The principles of Articles 54 and 55 of the Constitution, which was filed by the Prosecutor of the Accounting Chamber of the country, are being examined by the court and reviewed by arbitrary tribunals. This article reviews the way of revision of the opinions issued by the General Court and the Court of Justice. The analysis is to explain the distinction and correlation of the basis for the elimination of defects.
|
|
| Keywords: General Courts, Administrative Courts, Tribunal, Appeals, supreme Audit court |
|
|
Full-Text [PDF 222 kb]
(2303 Downloads)
|
|
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Add your comments about this article |
|
|
|
